Sunday Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 11°C
London
Sunday 22nd November 2009 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

UK NEWS

DIANA’S BEDROOM WAS BEING BUGGED

Story Image


BUGGED: Princess spoke of 'dark forces'

Tuesday January 8,2008

By Richard Palmer Royal Correspondent

PRINCESS Diana’s bedroom was bugged after her marriage break-up, her inquest heard yesterday.

Well-placed friends told her that five people had been assigned to oversee her, including bugging her phones, the jury heard.

At the resumed inquest into the deaths of Diana and Dodi Fayed, the jury heard evidence from an electronics expert who told how he once picked up a suspect eavesdropping signal in Diana’s bedroom.

Grahame Harding, who advised the Princess on ways to combat electronic surveillance, described how Diana first expressed fears that she was being monitored in 1994, two years after she and Charles separated.

She never told him who exactly she feared was responsible but talked of “dark forces” – the same words that Diana’s butler Paul Burrell claimed the Queen used to him in a conversation.

Mr Harding told the inquest jury at the Royal Courts of Justice in London how he swept her Kensington Palace apartments four times in 1994.

On one occasion he picked up a suspect signal behind her bedroom wall in a room used by Prince Charles.

He said: “I don’t know what was on the other side of this wall and was not able to investigate further as I didn’t have access.”

He told the jury the signal could have emanated from an entirely innocent source, such as a radio, but he was never able to explain the reading.

“It could have been some equipment in another room but the noise, whatever it was behind the wall, was such that it was very similar to a transmitting device that transmits on particular frequencies,” he said.

SEARCH UK NEWS for:


Mr Harding believed it might have been a device detecting speech. But when he went back a day or so later, there was no trace of the device.

The jury also heard that the Princess, who dispensed with police protection from December 1993 because she feared detectives were spying on her, was convinced that a British security services team was monitoring her.

On October 18, 1994, she met Deputy Assistant Commissioner David Meynell, the then head of Scotland Yard’s royal protection department, to voice her concerns.

The jury was read extracts of his record of the meeting in which Diana said friends had told her that five people from an unnamed organisation had been assigned to keep track of her every move.

Diana also said that the well-placed friends, whom she could not name because they would lose their jobs, had told her the same organisation carried out the same task in Parliament.

Michael Mansfield, QC for Dodi’s father Mohamed Al Fayed, told the court: “What I want to suggest is she is, without naming them, suggesting that the security services have been assigned this task and that’s she’s been told.”

At the same meeting Diana told Mr Meynell, who is now retired, that she had set four traps to establish that her phone was being bugged. She was also sure that a tracking device had been placed on her car.

“Even when no one knows where I’m going in my car, there are people waiting for me at the other end,” she said.

In court, Chief Superintendent Colin Haywood-Trimming, head of Charles and Diana’s police protection team, was asked what happened as a result of the fears the Princess had expressed.

He was met with incredulity from Mr Mansfield when he admitted he had no idea what actions were taken to deal with Diana’s complaints.

Diana’s relationship with another protection officer, Barry Mannakee – named in court as one of Diana’s seven lovers – was also aired at the hearing.

The inquest had previously heard that the Princess believed Sgt Mannakee, who died in a motorbike accident in 1987, had been “bumped off” because of their relationship.

All sides, however, now accept that there was nothing suspicious about his death.

Under pressure, Mr Haywood-Trimming confirmed it was his decision to move Sgt Mannakee to another post in 1986 because the handsome detective had got too close to Diana.

He said: “I  recognised that his relationship with the Princess of Wales was inappropriate because he had become over-familiar.”

The inquest, which is examining claims that Diana and Dodi were murdered by British spies on the orders of Prince Philip, is expected to last six months. It will resume tomorrow.


User Image

PARANOID??

09.01.08, 12:22am

I suppose she was paranoid about Camilla too. NOT!

• Posted by: MonikaReport Comment

User Image

WHAT BUGS ME

08.01.08, 7:35pm

is that after ten years we are still reading about this self absorbed, freebie grabbing pathetic individual. Give us a rest

• Posted by: fredjReport Comment

User Image

BUGGING BEDROOM ON WHOSE ORDERS?

08.01.08, 6:49pm

I guess it is safe to say Diana wasn't paranoid. Her bedroom was bugged and her phone conversations weren't private and were bugged by the British and US. Secret Services.
Diana may have kept the media informed of her plans when it was to her advantage, but she did want some privacy. How did the media know her every move 24/7? Who was the informant and why?
Why does the US Secret Service have a file on Diana and why won't they turn it over to the Inquiry? Can anyone really believe that Diana was a security risk for the USA? The woman was a humanitarian who, at times, became involved in unpopular issues, but she was not a political figure.

• Posted by: mrsh1963Report Comment

User Image

OF COURSE THEY WOULD

08.01.08, 6:12pm

Of course MI6 would have known where she was, we all did ,they were splashed all over the papers an d the news,all anyone had to do was to follow the photographers.
Even their luvvy dovey moments on the boat were captrured on film, no mystery or spies there

• Posted by: MaggieReport Comment

User Image

BUGGING

08.01.08, 4:16pm

I knew some military people back in the 1980s and they told me that being bugged was commonplace in the services once you'd reached a certain rank. So it's no surprise if Diana was bugged. Incidentally remember the transcript of the mobile phone conversation supposed to have been between Charles and Camilla, if it was of them then they were bugged as well!

• Posted by: PrideauxReport Comment

User Image

I BELIEVE IT!!

08.01.08, 4:00pm

With all due respect Fishergirl, anyone of us would have been a little paranoid in her position. The USA had a 32 page dossier on Diana and would never give it up even when asked for it by M16...


I believe her place was bugged... No doubt in my mind... I believe in the conspiracy therory as well!

Seven lovers? I hope she had the best of times .. how often does a 26 year old get shelved by her husband, so as the husband can carry on with his mistress! Charles is exceptionally stupid!

• Posted by: KateReport Comment

View All Comments

To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...

Share...

Got A Story? Get in touch online
Email the news desk directly here!


Miliband call to end Kenya violence

Foreign Secretary David Miliband issued a fresh call for political compromise to...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(1)

Brown fights to reclaim initiative

Gordon Brown is expected to push on with his political fightback as he stages hi...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(5)

Schoolgirl dies after house blast

A nine-year-old girl died in hospital today following an explosion at a house in...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year