Daily Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 10°C
London
Monday 23rd November 2009 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

UK NEWS

ARCHBISHOP ATTACKS BA OVER CROSS BAN

Tuesday November 21,2006

By Jo Willey and Sarah White

A BRITISH Airways worker yesterday attacked the airline for "forcing" her out of a job after she lost her fight to openly wear a tiny cross to work.

Devout Christian check-in clerk Nadia Eweida, 55, has been on unpaid leave, refusing to return to work since bosses told her last month that she could not wear the necklace visibly.

She has had to live off Christian charity handouts as she battles the airline's insistence that she conceals the faith symbol that is no bigger than a five pence piece.

This is despite workers of other faiths being allowed to openly wear religious symbols such as Sikh turbans and Muslim hijabs at Heathrow.

Miss Eweida, of Twickenham, south- west London, who looks after her elderly mother, insisted that BA's offer of a non-uniformed job where she could openly wear a cross amounted to her being "penalised and punished" because of her religion.

Speaking yesterday, she said: "Is the cross really so abhorrent that I need to be kept out of sight? Is it so awful?

"It is not a piece of jewellery. I choose to wear it because I want equal opportunity to share my faith."

After losing her appeal against the decision yesterday, Miss Eweida, who insists she has worn the cross throughout the seven years she has worked for BA, has one final chance to get the decision reversed.

She said: "Life is quite difficult without my salary. But I do translation work at the Home Office and they are helping me. Because I am job-share, my salary is about £680 per month and I have not been paid since October 6. My church community are helping me which is quite embarrassing, accepting charity."

The Archbishop of York Dr John Sentamu said: "The basis for the decision should not be ‘practicality', as BA suggests, but rather whether it impacts on Nadia's ability to do her job. Nadia's cross does not form an impediment to her ability at the check-in counter."

BA said: "The policy lays down that personal items of jewellery may be worn – but underneath the uniform.

"The policy recognises that it is not practical for some religious symbols – such as turbans and hijabs – to be worn underneath the uniform. This is purely a question of practicality. There is no discrimination whatsoever.

"In Nadia Eweida's case, she is not suspended and we want her to come back to work."

Devout Christian and Daily Express columnist Ann Widdecombe called for people who disapprove of the decision to boycott BA. She said: "The appalling thing is that this has been done in the teeth of public opinion."


Share...

Got A Story? Get in touch online
Email the news desk directly here!


The end of fish and chips?

By Tom Wainwright

FISH could be off the menu forever in 40 years beca...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Stem cell 'cure' for heart attack victims

By Jane Wharton

HEART attack victims are to get revolutionary new ste...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(2)

Fury over Halal Christmas dinner

By Paul Jeeves

PARENTS expressed outrage last night over a school&apo...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year