|
Columnists
![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYDiana’s bedroom was being buggedPRINCESS Diana’s bedroom was bugged after her marriage break-up, her inquest heard yesterday. Pages: 1 |
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
| Sunday 22nd November 2009 | ![]() |
Make us your HOME PAGE | ![]() |
What is RSS? |
|
Columnists
![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYDiana’s bedroom was being buggedPRINCESS Diana’s bedroom was bugged after her marriage break-up, her inquest heard yesterday. Pages: 1 |
|
||||||||
PARANOID??
09.01.08, 12:22am
I suppose she was paranoid about Camilla too. NOT!
Posted by: Monika Report Comment
WHAT BUGS ME
08.01.08, 7:35pm
is that after ten years we are still reading about this self absorbed, freebie grabbing pathetic individual. Give us a rest
Posted by: fredj Report Comment
BUGGING BEDROOM ON WHOSE ORDERS?
08.01.08, 6:49pm
I guess it is safe to say Diana wasn't paranoid. Her bedroom was bugged and her phone conversations weren't private and were bugged by the British and US. Secret Services.
Diana may have kept the media informed of her plans when it was to her advantage, but she did want some privacy. How did the media know her every move 24/7? Who was the informant and why?
Why does the US Secret Service have a file on Diana and why won't they turn it over to the Inquiry? Can anyone really believe that Diana was a security risk for the USA? The woman was a humanitarian who, at times, became involved in unpopular issues, but she was not a political figure.
Posted by: mrsh1963 Report Comment
OF COURSE THEY WOULD
08.01.08, 6:12pm
Of course MI6 would have known where she was, we all did ,they were splashed all over the papers an d the news,all anyone had to do was to follow the photographers.
Even their luvvy dovey moments on the boat were captrured on film, no mystery or spies there
Posted by: Maggie Report Comment
BUGGING
08.01.08, 4:16pm
I knew some military people back in the 1980s and they told me that being bugged was commonplace in the services once you'd reached a certain rank. So it's no surprise if Diana was bugged. Incidentally remember the transcript of the mobile phone conversation supposed to have been between Charles and Camilla, if it was of them then they were bugged as well!
Posted by: Prideaux Report Comment
I BELIEVE IT!!
08.01.08, 4:00pm
With all due respect Fishergirl, anyone of us would have been a little paranoid in her position. The USA had a 32 page dossier on Diana and would never give it up even when asked for it by M16...
I believe her place was bugged... No doubt in my mind... I believe in the conspiracy therory as well!
Seven lovers? I hope she had the best of times .. how often does a 26 year old get shelved by her husband, so as the husband can carry on with his mistress! Charles is exceptionally stupid!
Posted by: Kate Report Comment
BUGGED !! PROBABLY
08.01.08, 3:19pm
She was so paranoid she probably bugged it herself
Posted by: fishergirl Report Comment
DIANA’S BEDROOM WAS BEING BUGGED
08.01.08, 2:18pm
Wonder who was doing the Bugging AND UPON WHO'SE ORDERS ?
Posted by: AnthonyGibson Report Comment
JESSICA - OF COURSE MI6 WAS LYING
08.01.08, 1:49pm
What do you expect them to do? They knew perfectly well where Diana and Dodi were at all times as they were reading it in the Daily Express on a daily basis, but they are not going to admit to that are they?
Posted by: G0LDENARR0W Report Comment
SO WHAT?
08.01.08, 1:06pm
That being the case, if it was, it must have been
authorised for a reason
Posted by: Maggie Report Comment
HOW MANY MORE LIES
08.01.08, 12:15pm
it was also reported they didn't know Diana and Dodi where in Paris and MI6 were not following them, so how come MI6 where able to put together a report on the couples where abouts and the relationship for the way ahead group if they weren't following them.
of couse they knew exactly what Diana was doing, saying, where she was going, because they listened to every word.
Posted by: jessica Report Comment
BIT BLOODY PERVY WASN'T IT?
08.01.08, 11:12am
They'll tell us next they videoed them as well.
And they tell us there was no conspiracy, makes one wonder doesn't it?
Posted by: snaredrum Report Comment
HURRAH
08.01.08, 12:09am
Nice to see that the Daily Express has got its senior reporter to do the proper report. Probably explains why its of a more substantive quality, for a change.
Posted by: justicefordiana Report Comment