|
Columnists
![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYUS 'friendly fire' kills 3 British soldiersTHREE British soldiers have been killed and two injured after an American warplane dropped a bomb on their patrol in southern Afghanistan. Pages: 1 |
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
| Sunday 22nd November 2009 | ![]() |
Make us your HOME PAGE | ![]() |
What is RSS? |
|
Columnists
![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYUS 'friendly fire' kills 3 British soldiersTHREE British soldiers have been killed and two injured after an American warplane dropped a bomb on their patrol in southern Afghanistan. Pages: 1 |
|
||||||||
RIGHT AND WRONG.
24.08.07, 10:41pm
Emperor Mong, while you may be correct about U.S. 'blue-on-blue' culpability on multiple occasions, you are incorrect with regard to the legality of this action in Afghanistan.
You would be correct if this incident had happened in Iraq.
Albert
Posted by: AlbertM Report Comment
US 'FRIENDLY FIRE' KILLS 3 BRITISH SOLDIERS
24.08.07, 8:54pm
I remember a relative of mine telling me that the worst War Scenario possible is to have the Gung Ho Yanks involved.
Time after Time it happens - our lads get killed by American Fire.
The Yanks just dont seem to give a sh$t - they just loose off the Arsenal without a dam for who is in the way.
All I can say is that the War Monger Tony Blair has a lot to answer for for sending our lads there in the first place to fight his Illegal War.
Posted by: EmperorMing Report Comment
FAN-FOOKING-TASTIC
24.08.07, 4:51pm
its bad enough we're losing this useless war, but having your 'allies' dropping napalm on you is just what we need.
USA USA!
Posted by: JonhBond Report Comment
WITH ALLIES LIKE THE YANKS, WHO NEEDS ENEMIES!
24.08.07, 2:23pm
Not us thats for sure!
Posted by: The_Way_I_See_It Report Comment