Venus, I thought we were discussing living role models, not Diana?

Why bring Diana into the equation, Venus?

We are discussing role models and I pointed out the fact that people look to the top for moral examples and that Charles and Camilla are, as future King and Queen , further at the top than footbalers, Politicians and Prime Ministers, who are elected in and booted out if the public are not satisfied with the way they do their job or hold their promises?

Why do you think pointing a finger at the moral standards of Camilla and Charles, means one is discussing Diana?

Diana is dead.

Camilla is very much alive and it is her example as a married adulterous mother, having a very long term affair with the married heir to the throne, father of 2 Princes and future King, who is standing before us drenched in honours and titles and yet has set a very low and disgraceful moral example of how to get to the top by ruthless means with no regard for the consequences and repercussions on the institutions that need to be respected, that was being discussed.

What sort of an example has Camilla set as a woman who has got what she wanted out of lying, cheating and destroying others and yet is showered with honours and titles for having set such a example?

Does it look good?

Is this the example the world sees, now, as the 'British example'?

Footballers are not standing before us as future Heads of the Church or future Queens are they, Venus?

User Comments / Have Your Say

The opinions and views expressed in the above comment are purely those of the writer and in no way reflect the opinions or views of the Daily Express website, the Daily Express newspaper or Northern And Shell Media Publications. We accept no responsibilty legal or otherwise for the accurancy or truth of this comment.